RuukkilabraUpper secondary physics

ITER: why, where and who

Why would countries that often disagree build one fusion machine together instead of each building its own?

Prior knowledge

  • The 1985 Geneva summit and the large tokamaks JET and JT-60chapter Big machines and world politics: 1970s to 1985
  • A tokamak holds a plasma ring with magnetic fieldschapter Tokamak or stellarator?

Core path: follow the steps in order. Tasks marked Optional give extra practice. Optional tasks: 1.

Think about it

On a hill in southern France, about 5,000 people work on one machine. Its parts are made in factories in Asia, Europe and North America and travel by ship and by road to the site. Some parts weigh hundreds of tonnes. The countries that pay for it are often rivals in politics and in trade. The idea for the machine is about forty years old, and the machine has still not made its first plasma.

Why would countries that often disagree build one fusion machine together, and can such a project succeed?

Review: the machines before ITER

In chapter 5 you met JET in Britain and JT-60 in Japan, the largest fusion experiments of the 1980s. What kind of machine were they?

Predict

Make your predictions before investigating 2 questions

Prediction 1: why share one machine?

The partners decided to build one shared machine instead of several national ones. What do you think was the most important reason?

Prediction 2: the new plan

In 2016, ITER planned its first plasma for 2025. In 2024 ITER made a new plan.When do you think the new plan starts the first plasma experiments? Justify your choice: how large are delays in big projects you know of?

Investigate

Investigate 1: forty years in the timeline

The timeline below shows eight events about ITER. Open and read at least five of the cards (about 10 minutes). For each, make a short note: year, what happened, and whether it shows cooperation, progress or a problem.

From your notes, name two events that show cooperation or progress and two that show problems or delays. Write one sentence for each, with its year.

Why one machine for the world

In November 1985, at their first summit in Geneva, the Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev proposed to the US President Ronald Reagan that their countries should build a fusion experiment together. In 1987 four partners agreed to design it together: the European Community, Japan, the Soviet Union and the United States. The conceptual design began in 1988. The machine was called ITER; iter is also Latin for "the way".

Why share one machine? The next step after JET and JT-60 had to be a machine that makes far more fusion power than it receives. Such a machine is very large, it needs new technology from many industries, and it costs tens of billions of euros. No single country wanted to carry the whole cost and the whole risk. Sharing also brings together the knowledge of many fusion laboratories. And cooperation had a political value: rivals of the Cold War could work on a peaceful energy project. In return, every Member receives all the scientific results and the intellectual property that ITER produces.

Investigate 2: choosing the site

A two-year contest for the site. Four places were offered for ITER: Clarington in Canada, Vandellòs in Spain, Cadarache in France and Rokkasho in Japan. In November 2003 the European Union chose Cadarache as its one candidate, and in December 2003 the Canadian offer was withdrawn. The same month a meeting of ministers ended in deadlock: the European Union, China and Russia supported Cadarache, while Japan, Korea and the United States supported Rokkasho. The ministers said that both sites were excellent and needed more study.

Only on 28 June 2005, at a meeting in Moscow, did the partners agree on Cadarache. Japan, which lost the contest, received compensation: the Broader Approach projects in Japan, among them the satellite tokamak JT-60SA and a research facility for fusion materials. The first Director-General of ITER, Kaname Ikeda, was also Japanese.

The site is at Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, next to the French research centre CEA Cadarache, about 75 km north of Marseille. Studies showed that it met the geological, hydrological and seismic requirements and had water, electricity and a strong scientific and industrial environment. As the host, France prepared the 180-hectare site with its 42-hectare platform, opened an international school in Manosque for the staff's children and adapted 104 km of roads, the ITER Itinerary, so that the heaviest parts can travel from a Mediterranean port to the site.

Wide-angle aerial colour photograph of the ITER construction site: the round tokamak pit, tall assembly hall and cranes, surrounded by forest.
The ITER construction site at Saint-Paul-lez-Durance in southern France, photographed from a drone in 2017. Construction began in 2010. Photo: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
What does the contest for the site show about large international projects?

The plan that changed

A big project has a baseline: the official plan for its schedule and cost. ITER's baseline of 2016 planned a short first plasma in 2025 and deuterium–tritium ($\text{D–T}$) operation in 2035. On 3 July 2024, ITER presented a new baseline. It skips the early test plasma and starts with a more complete machine:

Milestone 2016 baseline 2024 baseline
first experiments 2025 (first plasma) 2034 (research)
deuterium–deuterium (D–D) — 2035
full magnetic energy 2033 2036
deuterium–tritium (D–T) 2035 2039
$2025$
$2030$
$2035$
$2040$
$\text{2016 plan}$
$\text{D–T}$
$\text{2024 plan}$
$\text{D–T}$
$\text{first plasma}$
$\text{research starts}$
$+4\ \text{years}$
$\text{Nov. 2026}$

ITER gave several reasons: the COVID-19 pandemic slowed factories and transport, some first-of-a-kind components were harder to make than expected, some key parts had defects that needed repairs, and some schedules were too optimistic. The repairs and changes were estimated to cost about five billion euros more. All the dates after 2026 are plans, not results.

Word bank

host country · Member · to contribute · in kind · a share · to compensate · a contest · a deadlock · to negotiate · a baseline (official plan) · a milestone · a delay · to postpone

Sentence starters

  • The host country gains …, but it also has to …
  • The other Members gain …
  • One advantage of sharing is …
  • A disadvantage of sharing is …
  • I agree with you, but …
  • The evidence suggests that …

Pair discussion: what does the host gain?

Discuss with a partner, using the word bank and the sentence starters. One of you argues for the host country, the other for the other Members.

Then write three or four sentences: what does France (and the EU) gain by hosting ITER, and what does it cost them? What do the other Members gain?

Theory summary

Who: seven Members

ITER has seven Members: China, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the United States. As the host, the European Union pays $45.6\ \%$ of the construction costs; the six others pay $9.1\ \%$ each. Together they represent more than thirty countries, because the EU counts its member states.

The Members pay mostly in kind: about nine-tenths of their contribution is delivered as finished components, systems or buildings, not as money. Each Member has a Domestic Agency that signs contracts with its own industry; Europe's agency is Fusion for Energy. On the site, the ITER Organization assembles the machine and will run it. It is led by a Director-General, since October 2022 Pietro Barabaschi, and the ITER Council, where every Member is represented, takes the major decisions. About 5,000 people work on the site and in its offices (2026).

Colour photograph of workers winding a thick superconducting cable into a coil in a factory.
Winding a module of ITER's central solenoid at General Atomics in the USA (2016). The central solenoid drives the electric current in the plasma. Photo: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Technical and organisational challenges

The technical challenges come from building parts that have never existed. In 2022 the steel sectors of the vacuum vessel did not have the right shape at their welding edges, and the cooling pipes of the thermal shield had cracks. Both had to be repaired, which halted the vessel assembly; the next sector module went into the pit only in April 2025. The parts must also fit to within millimetres, and the machine is a nuclear installation that must pass the French safety authority's rules.

The organisational challenges come from sharing. A coil made in one country must fit a part made in another, so thousands of interfaces must be managed. Decisions need the agreement of seven Members with their own budgets and politics. The United States left the project in 1998 and came back in 2003, and the United Kingdom left after Brexit.

As of November 2026, assembly is moving faster: in July 2026 the sixth of nine vacuum vessel modules was lowered into the pit, about six months ahead of the new schedule.

Sort the challenges

Back to your predictions

Compare your predictions with the text and the timeline. Then answer the opening question in one or two sentences: why do rival countries build one machine together?

    Would you change your prediction?

    Apply

    Put the story in order

    Find the errors

    A website wrote in 2026: "France is building ITER, which will produce $500\ \text{MW}$ of electricity from 2025." What needs to be corrected?

    Write: why is ITER international?

    Write a short paragraph of 60–80 words for your school's science newsletter: Why is ITER an international project? Give at least two reasons and one fact with a date or a number.

    Word bank

    to share the cost · the risk · knowledge · industry · a Member · in kind · peaceful cooperation · the Cold War

    Sentence starters

    • ITER is international because …
    • Another reason is …
    • For example, in …
    • As a result, …

    Common misconception

    "ITER is a French project, so France pays for it." France is the host country, but ITER belongs to seven Members. The European Union as a whole pays the largest share, and most of each Member's contribution is machine parts made in its own factories.

    A second mistake is to quote an old date as if it were still the plan. A newspaper of 2018 that writes "first plasma in 2025" reported the plan of that time correctly. That plan was replaced in 2024, so a text written today must give the date of the plan it quotes.

    Optional Role-play: Moscow, June 2005

    Groups of four: two of you speak for the European Union (Cadarache), two for Japan (Rokkasho). Prepare for five minutes, then negotiate for five minutes: why should the machine be built at your site, and what would you accept if it is not? Afterwards, write two sentences: what did your group agree, and was it close to what really happened?

    Word bank

    we propose · in return · we cannot accept · a compromise · compensation · both sides

    Sentence starters

    • We propose that …
    • In return, we would accept …
    • We cannot accept …, because …
    • A fair compromise would be …

    Check your understanding

    1. How ITER is paid for

    Which statement about how the Members pay for ITER is correct?

    Suggestion: one answer does not show everything you can do, but review the theory summary.

    2. The site

    Why did choosing the site of ITER take from 2003 to 2005?

    Suggestion: one answer does not show everything you can do, but review the theory summary.

    3. Reading a date

    In November 2026 a student writes: "ITER will start deuterium–tritium operation in 2035." What is the problem?

    Suggestion: one answer does not show everything you can do, but review the theory summary.

    4. The big question

    Can the world's largest fusion collaboration succeed? Write four to six sentences: one argument that it can, one argument that it may not, and your own conclusion. Use at least one dated fact, and say which facts are plans.

    Word bank

    to succeed · a goal · a delay · progress · a plan · a result · uncertain · to depend on

    Sentence starters

    • One reason to think ITER can succeed is …
    • On the other hand, …
    • This is a plan, not a result: …
    • In my view, …, because …

    Summary

    • ITER grew from the 1985 Geneva summit; four partners agreed in 1987 to design it together, and seven Members signed the ITER Agreement in 2006.
    • One machine is shared because it is too large, too expensive and too risky for one country, and because cooperation also has political value.
    • The site at Cadarache in southern France was chosen in Moscow on 28 June 2005, after a long contest with Rokkasho in Japan.
    • The Members pay mostly in kind, through Domestic Agencies; the ITER Organization assembles and runs the machine.
    • The 2024 baseline plans research operation in 2034 and $\text{D–T}$ operation in 2039. These are plans, not results.

    Le coin français

    ITER is built in the région Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur. Many people on the site speak English at work, but in the village, the shops and the school you hear French. Listen, repeat, and say the last sentence to your partner.

    Photographs and videos

    • Aerial view of the ITER site. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. source, CC BY 2.0
    • Winding the ITER central solenoid. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. source, CC BY 2.0